|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
26-09-2010, 02:34 PM | #1 | ||
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 382
|
Just had a brainwave and wondered why do police traditionally enforce road rules when:
- parking inspectors enforce parking rules (not the role of the police) - private companies are employed to run mobile speed cameras (supposedly not the role of the police?) Don't the police have enough on their hands already, without needing the added burden of sitting idle beside highways checking speed, for example. Also, the erosion of respect for police arising from them carrying out these duties, when they could better spend this time fighting violent crime, drugs, terrorism, etc., Certainly this can't be good? So, with some states like Victoria having the state road authority patrol cars (don't vicroads have fully marked vicroads patrol cars these days?), why can't the responsibility of patrolling the rules be carried out by these folk instead and police scrap the Traffic Management Units and replace them with different Task Forces? |
||