|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum. You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today! If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us. Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated. |
|
|||||||
| The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
20-03-2019, 05:14 PM
|
#1 | ||
|
FF.Com.Au Hardcore
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 11,430
|
Basically, at 70 mph or roughly 110 kph for 98miles, trip meter said 25.8 mpg (9.2 litres/100 km) wile actual miles divided by actual fuel was still 21.36 mpg (11 litres/100 km). I have to ask if they did the run at 60 mph (100 kph) would fuel economy be a lot better. The actual highway test loop used for official figures is done on a loaded dyno using the following speed profile that;s far from steady state.  It never gets to 70 mph in any part of the test... |
||
|
|
TFL Retests Fuel Economy of 2.3 EB Ranger
Threaded Mode