Welcome to the Australian Ford Forums forum.

You are currently viewing our boards as a guest which gives you limited access to view most discussions and inserts advertising. By joining our free community you will have access to post topics, communicate privately with other members, respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features without post based advertising banners. Registration is simple and absolutely free so please, join our community today!

If you have any problems with the registration process or your account login, please contact us.

Please Note: All new registrations go through a manual approval queue to keep spammers out. This is checked twice each day so there will be a delay before your registration is activated.

Go Back   Australian Ford Forums > General Topics > The Pub

The Pub For General Automotive Related Talk

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
Old 24-08-2006, 05:16 PM   #11
4.9 EF Futura
Official AFF conservative
 
4.9 EF Futura's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Adelaide, SA
Posts: 3,549
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by 05MkIIFutura
I agree and think people on this site need to make a change and frown upon topics which reference speeding or dangerous activities. Unless the post is clearly stated to be refering to drives done on closed motorsport circuits, there should be no reference to speeds over 110km/h

Why?? you ask.

From the RTA website:




This is just more proof that there IS considerable NEGATIVE consequences of travelling at faster than signposted speeds. Speed restrictions are set by proffessionals who have weighed up the gain of extra speed against the costs of reduced vehicle performance. We might feel our cars can comfortably do an extra 20-30km/h but it has side-effects
This is a great post and i challenge any of the self-proclaimed experts here on AFF (you know who you are) who claim "speed cameras are about revenue raising" to explain why they are above the laws of physics and how they are going to lose that additional 42km/hr impact speed when a child jumps in front of them 30m down the road and they're doing 60 in a 50.

All the nonsene catch phrases like "speed doesnt kill, innatenitve drivers do"... can someone please explain how they are going to get around these laws of phyisics?
__________________
A cup half empty... but full of euphoria.
4.9 EF Futura is offline   Reply With Quote Multi-Quote with this Post
 


Forum Jump


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Other than what is legally copyrighted by the respective owners, this site is copyright www.fordforums.com.au
Positive SSL